Fluid-Structure Interaction Chapter 1: Introduction
This chapter introduces fluid–structure interaction (FSI) as a coupled multi-physics problem where fluid flow and structural response influence each other through force, motion, and sometimes thermal exchange. The chapter establishes the conceptual framework of coupled systems, distinguishes between one-way and two-way coupling, and introduces the kinematic descriptions (Lagrangian, Eulerian, ALE) used to formulate FSI problems. The focus is on understanding when coupling matters and how different levels of coupling are classified in engineering simulations.
Context and Motivation
Modern engineering systems rarely involve a single physical field. Structures deform, fluids exert forces, and motion feeds back into the flow.
Typical examples include:
Aeroelasticity of wings and turbine blades
Wind–structure interaction in bridges and skyscrapers
Blood flow in deformable vessels
Sloshing in tanks and pressure surges
Vibrations induced by unsteady flow (VIV, flutter)
In all these cases:
Treating fluid and structure independently can be misleading
The interaction itself may dominate system behavior
FSI provides a framework to capture this interaction consistently.
Coupled Systems: General Concepts
3.1 What Is a Coupled System?
A coupled system consists of:
Multiple subsystems governed by different physical laws
Dynamic interaction through shared interfaces or fields
Key characteristics:
Heterogeneous physics (fluid, solid, thermal, etc.)
Mutual dependency between solution fields
Often nonlinear and multi-scale
3.2 Multi-Field vs Multi-Physics Problems
Multi-field problem
Multiple dependent variables (fields) solved together, possibly within one physics domain
Example: velocity–pressure coupling in incompressible flowMulti-physics problem
Multiple distinct physical models interacting
Example: fluid flow + structural deformation (FSI)
Important distinction:
Every multi-physics problem is multi-field, but not every multi-field problem is multi-physics.
Fluid–Structure Interaction (FSI)
4.1 Definition
FSI occurs when:
A fluid exerts forces (pressure, shear, thermal loads) on a structure
The structure responds through deformation or motion
This response alters the fluid flow
This creates a feedback loop:
Flow → structural response → modified flow → updated forces
4.2 Physical Interpretation
FSI strength depends on:
Fluid density and velocity
Structural stiffness and mass
Time scales of flow vs structure
Magnitude of deformation
If structural motion significantly changes the flow:
Two-way coupling is required
If not:One-way coupling may be sufficient
One-Way vs Two-Way Coupling
5.1 One-Way (Weak) Coupling
Process:
Solve fluid problem
Transfer loads to structure
Solve structural response
No feedback to fluid
Valid when:
Structural deformation is small
Flow field is insensitive to deformation
Interest is mainly in stresses or displacements
Typical uses:
Pressure loads on rigid or stiff components
Preliminary structural assessment
5.2 Two-Way (Strong) Coupling
Process:
Fluid and structure exchange data iteratively
Interface conditions are enforced repeatedly
Required when:
Deformations alter flow topology
Added-mass effects are important
Unsteady phenomena dominate (flutter, VIV, sloshing)
Classification of FSI Problems
FSI problems are commonly classified by:
6.1 Physical Coupling Strength
Weak: negligible feedback
Strong: mutual dependency
6.2 Deformation Magnitude
Small deformation (linearized geometry)
Large deformation (mesh motion required)
6.3 Time Dependence
Steady or quasi-steady
Fully transient
6.4 Mesh Compatibility
Conforming interfaces
Non-conforming interfaces with interpolation
Kinematic Descriptions
7.1 Lagrangian Description
Mesh follows material points
Natural for structural mechanics
Difficult for large fluid deformation
Used for:
Solids
Small-deformation fluids
7.2 Eulerian Description
Mesh fixed in space
Fluid flows through control volumes
Natural for CFD
Limitation:
Cannot directly track moving boundaries
7.3 Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE)
ALE blends both views:
Mesh moves independently of material
Allows boundary motion while controlling mesh distortion
Key role in FSI:
Enables moving fluid–structure interfaces
Foundation of most FSI formulations
Interface Conditions in FSI
At the fluid–structure interface, two conditions must be satisfied:
Kinematic continuity
Fluid and structure share the same velocity at the interface
Dynamic equilibrium
Forces transmitted across the interface are equal and opposite
Violating either leads to:
Non-physical results
Numerical instability
Partitioned vs Monolithic Approaches
9.1 Partitioned (Staggered) Approach
Separate solvers for fluid and structure
Data exchanged at interface
Most common in industrial software
Pros:
Flexibility
Reuse of existing solvers
Cons:
Stability issues for strong coupling
9.2 Monolithic Approach
Single system of equations
Strong numerical coupling
Pros:
Excellent stability
Cons:
Very complex
Rare in commercial CFD–FEA tools
Engineering Intuition
FSI is about feedback, not just loading
Added mass can destabilize simulations
Time scales matter more than mesh density
Weak coupling is often sufficient in early design
Strong coupling is mandatory for dynamic instability problems
Rule of thumb:
If deformation changes the flow pattern, you need two-way FSI.
Study Priorities
If short on time, focus on:
Definition of coupled and multi-physics systems
One-way vs two-way coupling logic
Physical meaning of FSI feedback
Lagrangian, Eulerian, and ALE viewpoints
Interface continuity conditions
Key Takeaways
FSI is a coupled fluid–solid problem with mutual feedback.
Not all problems require two-way coupling.
Coupling strength is a physical question first, numerical second.
ALE provides the kinematic framework for most FSI simulations.
Partitioned methods dominate industrial practice.

